How will people react the first time Kevin Garnett tells Jason Collins that Collins's boyfriend tastes like Honey Nut Cheerios? Will they be mad at Garnett for attacking a gay man via his sexuality? Will they be content that homosexuality is being treated the same way as heterosexuality at the highest levels of athletic competition? Will they migrate to other cereals?
yourplacefamily blog
Sharing with the searchbots
Saturday, May 18, 2013
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
Throwback
The stroke of genius Commander Hadfield demonstrates in this weirdly popular video is that he synergized Bowie's iconography and the space program: two things that fit together so well because they both fell apart so spectacularly in 1986.
I say, "Pfft," loudly and derisively to the whole scene. Call me when it's galaxy hero Commander Shepard singing in space and not some hoser with the mustache of a retired fireman and the body of someone whose muscle mass evaporated in zero gravity. If I want shitty karaoke with the occasional cool image of Earth from space thrown in to retain a modicum of my attention then I'll bring my Planet Earth DVDs down to the local pub on Wednesdays.
| This can be a "challenging" image for Millenials to identify |
I say, "Pfft," loudly and derisively to the whole scene. Call me when it's galaxy hero Commander Shepard singing in space and not some hoser with the mustache of a retired fireman and the body of someone whose muscle mass evaporated in zero gravity. If I want shitty karaoke with the occasional cool image of Earth from space thrown in to retain a modicum of my attention then I'll bring my Planet Earth DVDs down to the local pub on Wednesdays.
Sunday, May 5, 2013
Unlimited Appetite
Visiting my Grandma's house is like going to a Super Bowl party that lasts all weekend; I constantly eat as much junk food as I can because it is a "special" occasion.
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Getting Burned by the Ring of Fire
I enjoyed this Globe & Mail article that justifies Ontario's hypothetical secession from Canada on economic grounds. I've talked before about some of the other problems with federalism in this country, so I was very receptive to the article. However, there was one argument mentioned towards the end of the article that irked me:
I dislike this notion that government should be striving to develop asap the "Ring of Fire" because:
The get-resources-now attitude in that article reminds of a quotation from the CEO of a mega-corporation in a computer game:
So, what I'm saying is that those who want to use government subsidies and/or loose regulations to accelerate the extraction of minerals from the Ring of Fire share their worldview with a caricatured version of corporate avarice. I rest my case.
"prosperity will prove elusive, unless $12-billion that flows out of Ontario annually is used at home ... to supply the needed roads, energy and Internet without which Northern Ontario’s Ring of Fire, touted as the most promising Canadian mining development in a century, will never reach its full potential."
![]() |
| This gif was not part of the G&M article, I just thought it was awesome and marginally connected to the subject of this post enough that I could justify throwing it in here. |
I dislike this notion that government should be striving to develop asap the "Ring of Fire" because:
- If it such a lucrative opportunity, then private companies can make it happen.
- Environmentally, there is no rush to dig more open-pit mines in Northern Ontario.
- Those minerals aren't going anywhere. It's not like China is going to tunnel through the Earth to get them before Northern Ontario can cash in. The Ring of Fire is not a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, nor does it have an expiration date.
- Minerals are probably going to be worth more in the future.
- Mining in the Ring of Fire has "political headache" written all over it. It's on First Nations land and the government-Aboriginal relationship is kind of a mess right now, in case you haven't noticed. There are already barricades being up put up native bands to block planes from landing on frozen lakes in the Ring of Fire. There's no urgency to get involved in that mess.
- The aspirations people have for the Ring of Fire are conjecture anyway because it's just at the exploration stage right now. Why should the province feel compelled to invest in the hopes of a speculative benefit?
- Waiting might allow more environmentally-friendly technologies for extracting minerals to be developed.
| Open Pit Mine near Timmins, ON |
The get-resources-now attitude in that article reminds of a quotation from the CEO of a mega-corporation in a computer game:
Resources exist to be consumed. And consumed they will be, if not by this generation then by some future. By what right does this forgotten future seek to deny us our birthright? None I say! Let us take what is ours, chew and eat our fill.For those not familiar with the classic 1999 computer game Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri, it's basically Civilization with future technology on a distant planet because Earth got so messed up that humanity had to start again somewhere else. The game has seven factions that represent different value systems like the environmentalist faction, the collectivist faction, the militaristic faction, etc. Chariman Morgan is the leader of the capitalists' faction, and Morgan himself is a "self-made mogul and diamond tycoon." The faction as a whole is an "industrial conglomerate" that excels in production, especially when there is nothing to "hinder the just and free flow of capital."
-Chairman Mwabudike Morgan, "The Ethics of Greed"
So, what I'm saying is that those who want to use government subsidies and/or loose regulations to accelerate the extraction of minerals from the Ring of Fire share their worldview with a caricatured version of corporate avarice. I rest my case.
Saturday, February 23, 2013
Jeff Foxworthy-worthy
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Rank Ranked Ranks Post is a word play
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






